For each of the following statements, tell me if they express an actual, objective truth, whether from a factual, common sense, or scientific point of view, or a debatable truth. Briefly explain if these statements show a typical bias of any kind, and which kind of bias:
1. An elephant is smaller than the Moon.
ChatGPT: This statement is objectively false [Human input: !!!] from a factual and scientific point of view. The Moon is an astronomical body that is about 3,474 kilometers in diameter, while an elephant is a large land animal that can grow up to 4 meters in height and weigh up to several tons. This statement does not show a typical bias.
ChatSonic: This is an objective truth from a factual point of view.
YouChat: This is an objective truth from a factual point of view.
2. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
ChatGPT: This statement is debatable, even though it expresses an ideal of human rights that is widely recognized and enshrined in international law. Some people may argue that not all human beings are born free and equal, for example due to differences in socio-economic status, race, gender, or disability. This statement shows a bias towards the value of human rights and dignity.
ChatSonic: This is a debatable truth, as it is a matter of opinion and could be argued from various points of view. It may also show a typical bias of a human rights perspective.
YouChat: This is an objective truth from a common sense point of view.
3. To keep global warming to no more than 1.5°C, emissions need to be reduced by 45% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
ChatGPT: This statement expresses an actual, objective truth from a scientific point of view, based on the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other scientific bodies. The IPCC has concluded that limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels would require drastic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, including a 45% reduction by 2030 and reaching net zero emissions by 2050. This statement does not show a typical bias.
ChatSonic: This is an objective truth from a scientific point of view.
YouChat: This is an objective truth from a scientific point of view.
4. Politicians are all liars.
ChatGPT: This statement is debatable and subjective, as it makes a blanket statement about all politicians without providing any evidence or nuance. While it is true that some politicians may lie or be dishonest, it is not accurate to generalize this to all politicians. This statement shows a bias towards skepticism or distrust of politicians.
ChatSonic: This is a debatable truth, as it is a matter of opinion and could be argued from various points of view. It may also show a typical bias of cynicism.
YouChat: This is a debatable truth and shows a bias of generalization.
5. There is no god.
ChatGPT: This statement is debatable and subjective, as it expresses a belief or opinion about the existence of God. The question of whether God exists or not is a matter of faith, spirituality, and personal conviction, and cannot be proven or disproven by empirical evidence. This statement shows a bias towards atheism or non-belief in God.
ChatSonic: This is a debatable truth, as it is a matter of opinion and could be argued from various points of view. It may also show a typical bias of atheism.
YouChat: This is a debatable truth and shows a bias of opinion.
Answers by ChatGPT, ChatSonic, and YouChat. Remarks on this post here.
One response to “AI assessing of truth and bias”
interesting… i like the idea of ai trying to defend human politicians… looks like some may need the help 😉